Update WINE's 1.0.1 todo list?

AL3X2 · Post by **AL3X2** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 4:11 pm

I think that somebody should update the WINE's TODO list for 1.0.1
All the bugs in the list (http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?prod ... g_severity) are closed/fixed.

Gert van den Berg · Post by **Gert van den Berg** » Tue Dec 09, 2008 12:02 am

On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:11 PM, AL3X2 <[email protected]> wrote:

I think that somebody should update the WINE's TODO list for 1.0.1
All the bugs in the list (http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?prod ... g_severity) are closed/fixed.

[Rolling Eyes]

That might just be because Wine 1.0.1 is released?

austin987 · Post by **austin987** » Tue Dec 09, 2008 12:58 am

On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Gert van den Berg <[email protected]> wrote:

On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:11 PM, AL3X2 <[email protected]> wrote:
I think that somebody should update the WINE's TODO list for 1.0.1
All the bugs in the list (http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?prod ... g_severity) are closed/fixed.

[Rolling Eyes]

That might just be because Wine 1.0.1 is released?

Yeah, we should probably remove that, as Alexandre isn't planning
another stable release until 1.2.0. I'll send a patch in a couple days
once the new website goes live.

--
-Austin

James Mckenzie · Post by **James Mckenzie** » Tue Dec 09, 2008 9:08 am

Gert van den Berg <[email protected]> at Dec 8, 2008 10:02 PM (MST) wrote about [Wine] Update WINE's 1.0.1 todo list?

On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:11 PM, AL3X2 <[email protected]> wrote:
I think that somebody should update the WINE's TODO list for 1.0.1
All the bugs in the list (http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?prod ... g_severity) are closed/fixed.

[Rolling Eyes]

That might just be because Wine 1.0.1 is released?

Just might be. There should be a Wine 1.0.2 list as well. I'm guessing there should also be a Wine 1.2 list, too.

James McKenzie

austin987 · Post by **austin987** » Tue Dec 09, 2008 11:55 am

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:07 AM, James Mckenzie
<[email protected]> wrote:

Gert van den Berg <[email protected]> at Dec 8, 2008 10:02 PM (MST) wrote about [Wine] Update WINE's 1.0.1 todo list?
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:11 PM, AL3X2 <[email protected]> wrote:
I think that somebody should update the WINE's TODO list for 1.0.1
All the bugs in the list (http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?prod ... g_severity) are closed/fixed.

[Rolling Eyes]

That might just be because Wine 1.0.1 is released?
Just might be. There should be a Wine 1.0.2 list as well. I'm guessing there should also be a Wine 1.2 list, too.

Unless Alexandre has changed his mind in the last month or so, no,
there shouldn't be. He's not planning on a 1.0.2 update.

There *IS* a 1.2 list already.

--
-Austin

James McKenzie · Post by **James McKenzie** » Tue Dec 09, 2008 9:41 pm

Austin English wrote:

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:07 AM, James Mckenzie
<[email protected]> wrote:

Gert van den Berg <[email protected]> at Dec 8, 2008 10:02 PM (MST) wrote about [Wine] Update WINE's 1.0.1 todo list?

On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:11 PM, AL3X2 <[email protected]> wrote:
That might just be because Wine 1.0.1 is released?

Just might be. There should be a Wine 1.0.2 list as well. I'm guessing there should also be a Wine 1.2 list, too.

Unless Alexandre has changed his mind in the last month or so, no,
there shouldn't be. He's not planning on a 1.0.2 update.

There *IS* a 1.2 list already.

Good. Then the 'old' 1.0.1 list should go and anything left unresolved
should be moved to 1.2, correct?

James McKenzie

austin987 · Post by **austin987** » Tue Dec 09, 2008 9:43 pm

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:40 PM, James McKenzie
<[email protected]> wrote:

Austin English wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:07 AM, James Mckenzie
<[email protected]> wrote:

Gert van den Berg <[email protected]> at Dec 8, 2008 10:02 PM (MST) wrote about [Wine] Update WINE's 1.0.1 todo list?
Just might be. There should be a Wine 1.0.2 list as well. I'm guessing there should also be a Wine 1.2 list, too.

Unless Alexandre has changed his mind in the last month or so, no,
there shouldn't be. He's not planning on a 1.0.2 update.

There *IS* a 1.2 list already.

Good. Then the 'old' 1.0.1 list should go and anything left unresolved
should be moved to 1.2, correct?

James McKenzie

It should go away, yes, but anything nominated for 1.0.1 should've
BEEN in 1.0.1. 1.0.1 was a stable update, only containing patches that
were already in git and deemed stable. Hence, anything nominated for
1.0.1 already will be in 1.2.0.

--
-Austin