Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Open forum for end-user questions about Wine. Before asking questions, check out the Wiki as a first step.
Forum Rules
David Gerard

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by David Gerard »

2008/7/2 Paul Johnson <[email protected]>:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13517
Is Wine going to have to lose even more experienced users over a stupid
bug? Does WineHQ really value new users over those who have the
knowledge and are willing to help? Let's move towards resolution on
this and consolidate on Google Groups already, before it's too late.
Speaking as someone who uses the mailing list and hates forum
interfaces, I actually hate using Google Groups more. It's not clear
why they can't do for Usenet what they did for email, but they've
comprehensively failed to.

Not to mention that Google Groups does not automatically equal Usenet,
as Google Groups' unwillingness to deal with spammers has led to
what's left of Usenet frequently dropping all posts via Google.

Forums may break threading, etc. This is a problem to be fixed in the
software, not by getting rid of a whole new bunch of end-users that
the Wine project can finally hear from.


- d.
Hartmut Figge

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by Hartmut Figge »

David Gerard:
Forums may break threading, etc. This is a problem to be fixed in the
software,
That is not only a software problem. How could a software e.g. insert
proper quotes? *eg*
not by getting rid of a whole new bunch of end-users that
the Wine project can finally hear from.
Is someone speaking of getting rid of the forum? Those who like it may
stay there. But, the gateway to the mailing list is an evil and should
be closed.

Hartmut
User avatar
dimesio
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 13367
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:30 pm

Post by dimesio »

Is someone speaking of getting rid of the forum? Those who like it may
stay there. But, the gateway to the mailing list is an evil and should
be closed.
Sounds reasonable to me. Email and forums are very different styles of communicating, and trying to mix them is inevitably going to lead to culture clashes. The issue of quoting, which seems to be the main problem for email users, is a perfect example: from my perspective, not having to quote is one of the advantages of a forum, and remembering to do so for those on the mailing list is something of an annoyance.

But then, I "haven't been around long enough to matter," so feel free to dismiss anything I say as irrelevant.
Zachary Goldberg

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by Zachary Goldberg »

I'm still terribly confused: Whats the problem with the status quo?
Things seem to be running very smoothly...

-Zach
austin987
Wine Developer
Wine Developer
Posts: 2383
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 8:19 pm

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by austin987 »

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Hartmut Figge <[email protected]> wrote:
Is someone speaking of getting rid of the forum? Those who like it may
stay there. But, the gateway to the mailing list is an evil and should
be closed.
There's a decisive lack of experienced users on the forum. Vitaliy,
dimesio, (maybe L Rahyen, but I can't recall off hand if he's using
the mailing list or not) and a few others help out a lot, but the
majority of actual forum users are new users.
austin987
Wine Developer
Wine Developer
Posts: 2383
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 8:19 pm

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by austin987 »

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Zachary Goldberg <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm still terribly confused: Whats the problem with the status quo?
Things seem to be running very smoothly...

-Zach

Many forum users are forgetting to quote, editing their posts,etc.

Mailing list users are changing e-mail subjects, breaking threads.
hendrik

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by hendrik »

On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 08:49:16AM -0500, dimesio wrote:
Is someone speaking of getting rid of the forum? Those who like it may
stay there. But, the gateway to the mailing list is an evil and should
be closed.
Sounds reasonable to me. Email and forums are very different styles of
communicating, and trying to mix them is inevitably going to lead to
culture clashes. The issue of quoting, which seems to be the main
problem for email users, is a perfect example: from my perspective,
not having to quote is one of the advantages of a forum, and
remembering to do so for those on the mailing list is something of an
annoyance.

But then, I "haven't been around long enough to matter," so feel free
to dismiss anything I say as irrelevant.
You do matter. As a forum user.

But if you prefer not to be on the mailing list, and
prefer to be on the forum, well, then, there's not much point
forcing you to be on the mailing list and making you get complaints
about not quoting, is there?

-- hendrik
Zachary Goldberg

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by Zachary Goldberg »

On 7/2/08, Austin English <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Zachary Goldberg <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm still terribly confused: Whats the problem with the status quo?
Things seem to be running very smoothly...

-Zach

Many forum users are forgetting to quote, editing their posts,etc.
Can't we disable post editing on the BB? If people forget quotes I
dont think much harm is done. Theres always a little bit lost in
translation.
Mailing list users are changing e-mail subjects, breaking threads.
That breaks email threads too -- so thats a user consciously doing
something wrong. Not our issue.


None of this sounds like a big enough issue to warrant any change.
Maybe minor tweaking if some people are agitated but I doubt even that
thats the case.

-Zach
felix
Level 2
Level 2
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:04 am

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by felix »

On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 10:02:15AM +0200, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Is someone speaking of getting rid of the forum? Those who like it may
stay there. But, the gateway to the mailing list is an evil and should
be closed.
tbh, it just needs the phpBB2 module to be fixed up a bit. That or help
get version 2 of the code working.

--
Darragh

"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool."
Paul Johnson

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by Paul Johnson »

On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 08:35 +0100, David Gerard wrote:
2008/7/2 Paul Johnson <[email protected]>:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13517
Is Wine going to have to lose even more experienced users over a stupid
bug? Does WineHQ really value new users over those who have the
knowledge and are willing to help? Let's move towards resolution on
this and consolidate on Google Groups already, before it's too late.
Speaking as someone who uses the mailing list and hates forum
interfaces, I actually hate using Google Groups more. It's not clear
why they can't do for Usenet what they did for email, but they've
comprehensively failed to.
How so? Google Groups mailing lists set the correct headers and thread
properly. That ALONE makes it superior to the current situation.

--
Paul Johnson
[email protected]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-us ... chment.pgp
Paul Johnson

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by Paul Johnson »

On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 08:54 -0500, Austin English wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Hartmut Figge <[email protected]> wrote:
Is someone speaking of getting rid of the forum? Those who like it may
stay there. But, the gateway to the mailing list is an evil and should
be closed.
There's a decisive lack of experienced users on the forum. Vitaliy,
dimesio, (maybe L Rahyen, but I can't recall off hand if he's using
the mailing list or not) and a few others help out a lot, but the
majority of actual forum users are new users.
This is why I feel that WineHQ is doing a great disservice to new users
by valuing their preferred interface over something that works right:
Who cares about bling if nobody is willing to help anymore?

--
Paul Johnson
[email protected]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-us ... chment.pgp
Paul Johnson

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by Paul Johnson »

On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 08:49 -0500, dimesio wrote:
Is someone speaking of getting rid of the forum? Those who like it may
stay there. But, the gateway to the mailing list is an evil and should
be closed.
Sounds reasonable to me. Email and forums are very different styles of
communicating, and trying to mix them is inevitably going to lead to
culture clashes. The issue of quoting, which seems to be the main
problem for email users, is a perfect example: from my perspective,
not having to quote is one of the advantages of a forum, and
remembering to do so for those on the mailing list is something of an
annoyance.
The gateway is breaking threads, which is why it's so important to
quote. Plus not everybody reads every message, lack of quotes even in
forums tends to present confusion on long threads (whether or not users
are willing to admit this). The gateway is also not rewrapping lines:
Forum posters post an entire paragraph on one line.

--
Paul Johnson
[email protected]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-us ... chment.pgp
Paul Johnson

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by Paul Johnson »

On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 09:52 -0400, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
I'm still terribly confused: Whats the problem with the status quo?
Things seem to be running very smoothly...
Or not. Read the bugzilla entry, please.

--
Paul Johnson
[email protected]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-us ... chment.pgp
Paul Johnson

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by Paul Johnson »

On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 10:01 -0400, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
On 7/2/08, Austin English <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Zachary Goldberg <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm still terribly confused: Whats the problem with the status quo?
Things seem to be running very smoothly...

-Zach

Many forum users are forgetting to quote, editing their posts,etc.
Can't we disable post editing on the BB? If people forget quotes I
dont think much harm is done. Theres always a little bit lost in
translation.
Great harm is done: Context is 100% lost, especially since the forum
breaks threading.
Mailing list users are changing e-mail subjects, breaking threads.
That breaks email threads too -- so thats a user consciously doing
something wrong. Not our issue.
You might want to look into how threading works. It is not determined
by the subject line in the slightest. You can have a thread with each
message having a COMPLETELY different subject, or no subject at all.
None of this sounds like a big enough issue to warrant any change.
Maybe minor tweaking if some people are agitated but I doubt even that
thats the case.
Read the archives. We are losing experienced people over this problem,
and WineHQ seems unwilling or unable to do anything to fix it within the
existing software.

--
Paul Johnson
[email protected]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-us ... chment.pgp
User avatar
L. Rahyen
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:13 pm

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by L. Rahyen »

On Wednesday July 2 2008 13:54:49 Austin English wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Hartmut Figge <[email protected]> wrote:
Is someone speaking of getting rid of the forum? Those who like it may
stay there. But, the gateway to the mailing list is an evil and should
be closed.
There's a decisive lack of experienced users on the forum. Vitaliy,
dimesio, (maybe L Rahyen, but I can't recall off hand if he's using
the mailing list or not) and a few others help out a lot, but the
majority of actual forum users are new users.
Well, I'm using mailing list but also I'm using ML <-> Forum gateway
(obviously). Without this gateway, I will not be able to answer to forum
users at all (recently I'm very busy in real life so I don't write to the
list/forum frequently at this moment but this hopefully will improve in near
future). Also, I'm using gateway to monitor "illegal" activities on the forum
like spam posting, etc. so such garbage can be deleted ASAP. And of course
I'm using it to just read messages/discussions from forum users.
Let's not forget whole point of this gateway. Its primary purpose - to help
users find one place to ask questions, so everybody who want to help can do
so in one place too. This simplify many things a lot.
In my opinion *only* problem we have with gateway it is the fact that gateway
doesn't set In-Reply-To header perfectly but to me this looks like very minor
problem - at least in KMail I haven't any trouble understanding replies from
forum users (all their replies looks like reply to the first post in a thread
but it's easy to understand proper order if sorting by date is enabled). Of
course threads doesn't look perfectly with not perfectly set In-Reply-To
headers but I think it is too much to say that this minor bug is "breaking
mailing list". For example, I have thread support in my e-mail client enabled
but don't have trouble understanding replies from forum users because all of
them are shown in proper thread (at least this is true for KMail).
Yes, for some people this cosmetic problem is important. Yes, I understand
why they can't improve gateway: they either aren't programmers or don't have
enough time/motivation. But fact is that this bug will not magically disappear
by itself - someone should find enough free time and motivation to fix it.
Talking like that: "Forums are "breaking" mailing list so let's break the
gateway instead!" doesn't help anyone. And breaking gateway is MUCH worse
thing. Therefore only proper solution to the problem is to fix the bug.
Paul Johnson

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by Paul Johnson »

On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 19:29 +0000, L. Rahyen wrote:
Talking like that: "Forums are "breaking" mailing list so let's break the
gateway instead!" doesn't help anyone. And breaking gateway is MUCH worse
thing. Therefore only proper solution to the problem is to fix the bug.
I suggested a way to fix it in a mutually beneficial, WineHQ endorsed
way. People shit on it.

--
Paul Johnson
[email protected]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-us ... chment.pgp
Hartmut Figge

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by Hartmut Figge »

L. Rahyen:
Well, I'm using mailing list but also I'm using ML <-> Forum gateway
(obviously). Without this gateway, I will not be able to answer to forum
users at all [...]
Mhm, you could subscribe to the forum and continue to help there.
And of course I'm using it to just read messages/discussions from
forum users.
The gateway is not essential in doing so. ;)
Let's not forget whole point of this gateway. Its primary purpose - to help
users find one place to ask questions, so everybody who want to help can do
so in one place too. This simplify many things a lot.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
It is this 'one place' that causes problems. There is a good reason for
the forum to exist and it should surely continue to exist.

There are people who want to help at the forum. A good thing. But they
should do so after subscribing to the forum. Currently the mailing list
gets hurt seriously.
In my opinion *only* problem we have with gateway it is the fact that gateway
doesn't set In-Reply-To header perfectly [...]
The main problems are missing references, which destroys threading,
missing quotings and these endless lines. No linebreak after about 72 chars.

Hard to read. Very hard. And replying with citing requires manually
rewrapping of the text. At least with my SeamMonkey.

And i do not see any hope for this issue, because these endless lines
are well suited for the forum. But for the ML? ARGL.
but to me this looks like very minor problem - at least in KMail I
haven't any trouble understanding replies from forum users (all their
replies looks like reply to the first post in a thread but it's easy
to understand proper order if sorting by date is enabled).
Threading by subject is possible, but causes other problems. The right
thing is threading by references. And if there is no reference, then
replies will pop up in a new thread.

Examples are <[email protected]> and
<[email protected]>
Of course threads doesn't look perfectly with not perfectly set
In-Reply-To headers but I think it is too much to say that this minor
bug is "breaking mailing list".
It is one of the problems but not the only one.
Yes, I understand why they can't improve gateway: they either aren't
programmers or don't have enough time/motivation.
Improving the gateway could help with the references, but not with
proper quoting or avoiding endless lines. And why should forum people do
so? For the forum it is perfectly appropriate. *g*

[...]
Therefore only proper solution to the problem is to fix the bug.
Yes. By closing the gateway. :-P

Hartmut
Paul Johnson

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by Paul Johnson »

On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 22:26 +0200, Hartmut Figge wrote:
L. Rahyen:
Well, I'm using mailing list but also I'm using ML <-> Forum gateway
(obviously). Without this gateway, I will not be able to answer to forum
users at all [...]
Mhm, you could subscribe to the forum and continue to help there.
That defeats the purpose, though. Forums lack filters, comfortable
interface, and doesn't pose an immediate usability issue if the server
is down or unreachable.
And of course I'm using it to just read messages/discussions from
forum users.
The gateway is not essential in doing so. ;)
Without the gateway, the newbies won't get help unless they're willing
to join the mailing list.
Improving the gateway could help with the references, but not with
proper quoting or avoiding endless lines. And why should forum people do
so? For the forum it is perfectly appropriate. *g*
Never mind the forum is a front end to a mailing list in this case.

--
Paul Johnson
[email protected]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-us ... chment.pgp
User avatar
L. Rahyen
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:13 pm

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by L. Rahyen »

On Wednesday July 2 2008 20:26:49 Hartmut Figge wrote:
And of course I'm using it to just read messages/discussions from
forum users.
The gateway is not essential in doing so. ;)
Well, it is for me. I have very-very slow outgoing connection (1-2 KiB/s)
with fast ingoing connection (1-2 MiB/s). Yeah, approximately 1000 times
difference. So single large files can be downloaded fast but downloading a
large number of small files is painfully slow - including forum pages.
And even with fast connection forum is much less convenient for me than
mailing list anyway.
However, I want to help forum users and the gateway makes this possible.
Let's not forget whole point of this gateway. Its primary purpose - to
help users find one place to ask questions, so everybody who want to help
can do so in one place too. This simplify many things a lot.
It is this 'one place' that causes problems. There is a good reason for
the forum to exist and it should surely continue to exist.

There are people who want to help at the forum. A good thing. But they
should do so after subscribing to the forum.
What do you mean by "subscribing"? I'm subscribed to the forum via gateway
and also registered on the forum as moderator. However, no gateway means no
subscription (only web interface of the forum). Which isn't option for me and
other people who want to help users but don't want or cannot use web
interface (forum).
No linebreak after about 72 chars.

Hard to read. Very hard. And replying with citing requires manually
rewrapping of the text. At least with my SeamMonkey.
Well, I don't have such problem. Everything looks great for me in KMail.
Perhaps you can fix this in your Options?
BTW, this looks like very easy thing to fix. Just preprocess messages with
fmt before finally sending them to the mailing list. If the gateway have
option to preprocess its output with standard commands before sending - this
might be quick and proper solution to fix the problem. If not - it shouldn't
be hard to implement this simple feature. BTW, is there a bug report for this
problem?
However, most of e-mail clients should display messages from the forum
properly.
Yes, I understand why they can't improve gateway: they either aren't
programmers or don't have enough time/motivation.
Improving the gateway could help with the references, but not with
proper quoting or avoiding endless lines.
Why not? "Endless lines" aren't problem for good e-mail client and this can
be fixed easily in the gateway as I suggested.
And why should forum people do so? For the forum it is perfectly
appropriate.
Well, I never don't do wrapping by hand either when I'm writing something. My
client does it for me (but I can turn this feature off; BTW I receive often
messages from people who don't use automatic wrapping in their client or
web-interface).
For compatibility with clients which can't do the wrapping automatically we
may want to preprocess messages from gateway with fmt as I suggested above.
Therefore only proper solution to the problem is to fix the bug.
Yes. By closing the gateway. :-P
No. Only by *fixing* it, not by breaking everything else severely. If you
don't have motivation to do so or don't have enough knowledge that doesn't
make breaking one thing *severely* to fix one or few *cosmetic* problems
right thing.
Similarly I can tell you: "Throw away stupid e-mail client which can't wrap
messages for you and can't put them in one thread automatically when
necessary". Or: "File a bug report with developers of your e-mail client".
BTW, technically these two solutions would be much less harmful than breaking
the gateway. But I don't say such things because this is rude and not
respectful. If you for some reason don't like the gateway and don't care
enough to fix it (or don't like to help newbies) - you still should respect
others who like it and use it "as is".
And remember - *most* users use the forum. It would be disaster if people who
want to help them via mailing list will not be able to do so. Just look in
the archives for a lot of examples where user from mailing list helps user
from the forum. And users from the forum are helping users from the mailing
list too.

Wine Project have good policy about bugs: no matter what the problem is -
only acceptable solution is to fix it without improper hacks or severe
breakages somewhere else (remember bug with OpenGL child windows - its very
good example). Yes, sometimes it may took some time and may be somewhat
annoying but things are fixed properly in the end.
You said yourself that "the right thing is threading by references". This
makes everything else "wrong thing" (especially effectively destroying all
messages from the forum for mailing list users): only proper solution is to
fix the code so gateway can do "the right thing".
In this particular case we just lack a developer who has enough motivation to
fix one or two cosmetic problems in the gateway. So someone should either
become one or hire one; if not - just wait.
Hartmut Figge

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by Hartmut Figge »

Paul Johnson:
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 22:26 +0200, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Mhm, you could subscribe to the forum and continue to help there.
That defeats the purpose, though. Forums lack filters, comfortable
interface, and doesn't pose an immediate usability issue if the server
is down or unreachable.
Right, the mailing list offers many advantages. Forum people can get
help by those, who join the forum, or they could subscribe to the ML
themselves and accept the rules there.

These rules *are* necessary. Using the forum as a front end to the ML is
the wrong way, because that hurts the rules.

But who am i to complain? I am just a normal user who wants to benefit
from the ML. So i will stop complaining now. :)

Hartmut
Paul Johnson

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by Paul Johnson »

On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 21:53 +0000, L. Rahyen wrote:
In this particular case we just lack a developer who has enough motivation to
fix one or two cosmetic problems in the gateway. So someone should either
become one or hire one; if not - just wait.
Or take Dan Kegel's suggestion and move it to Google Groups.

--
Paul Johnson
[email protected]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-us ... chment.pgp
Zachary Goldberg

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by Zachary Goldberg »

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 19:29 +0000, L. Rahyen wrote:
Talking like that: "Forums are "breaking" mailing list so let's break the
gateway instead!" doesn't help anyone. And breaking gateway is MUCH worse
thing. Therefore only proper solution to the problem is to fix the bug.
I suggested a way to fix it in a mutually beneficial, WineHQ endorsed
way. People shit on it.
Firstly: With language like that how can you expect your idea to be
listend to and accepted?

Secondly: You seem to be the only person very upset by this. I read
the history of this thread and the bugzilla and I legitimately do not
see any need to change anything. Apparently I'm not alone either (see
above posts in this thread).

Thirdly: Even if there were a significant problem a complete switch to
a new system that this community is used to is most likely *not* the
optimal solution. Just because you suggested it and its 'mutually
beneficial' does not mean it's correct or that it should be adopted.
Other proposals have also been offered which seem to require much less
drastic a change.

Finally: I move that we close this thread. If there is still residual
discomfort about the few cosmetic issues surrounding the gateway would
any party willing to put fourth the work to fix the problem without
replacing the whole system start a new thread with their ideas?

--Zach
User avatar
L. Rahyen
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:13 pm

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by L. Rahyen »

On Wednesday July 2 2008 23:18:23 Zachary Goldberg wrote:
Finally: I move that we close this thread. If there is still residual
discomfort about the few cosmetic issues surrounding the gateway would
any party willing to put fourth the work to fix the problem without
replacing the whole system start a new thread with their ideas?
Personally I think this is what should be done if these cosmetic issues are
so minor that no one wants to actually fix them (yet):

1) Report a bug about not perfect headers to the developers of the
gateway (not to Wine' Bugzilla because we don't have a developer for this
yet). Of course with clear explanation about what the problem is, what is the
difference between expected and current behavior, etc. They are more likely
to have a developer who will fix this.
2) What about "too long lines" problem this isn't even a bug in the gateway -
it is a bug in the mail client if it can't display such messages properly
(most of e-mail clients don't have such problem). BTW, it is legitimate to
send messages by e-mail without forced line wrapping (and sometimes even
preferred - for example if you sending a message to wine-patches with a patch
in the body). If someone thinks we should care about this compatibility issue
with broken clients - it is good idea first to ask site admin: perhaps there
is already an option in the gateway to preprocess messages with standard
Linux command like fmt in order to force line wrapping for broken clients. If
there is no such option yet - post a feature request to the developers of the
gateway. There is some caveats however - for example, if forum user post a
backtrace or terminal output it might be wrapped and this is bad. Therefore
personally I think that this issue should be fixed on client side and has
nothing to do with the gateway. If someone think otherwise please discuss
this with site admin - only he decides is such a change acceptable or not.

To me it seems that developers of the gateway might be even not aware yet
about issue #1 - most people (possibly including developers of the gateway)
simply will not notice it.
I'm noticing it and don't like it but it isn't big annoyance for me because
as I said before I don't have any trouble understanding messages from forum
users.

If someone find enough free time to report a bug to the developers of the
gateway about issue #1 - please post a link to it here.
Arthur Squassabia

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by Arthur Squassabia »

myself still a greeny i would hate to see lost experienced users over such a
problem as this

for the oldies that would like it I'll invite you to gmail, so far it has
worked wonderfully in grouping same threaded posts/e-mails together, and as
long as you don't delete current threads/discussion all of the e-mails/posts
will stay linked and because of the ridiculous amounts of storage that gmail
provides (for myself 6.9 GB) deleting email is almost never neccesary.

as of now i only have 50 invites but the regenerate over time so if your
thinking of leaving over this problem please at least try gmail before you
go

send me an email directly so that you wont have to risk getting spammed by
having your e-mail address posted on the forum

also to help me sort my e-mail please make the subject "(your screen name
here) gmail request"

[email protected]

gmail has a fantastic spam filter too so i'm not very worried

--
"Black holes are where god divided by Zero."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-us ... chment.htm
David Gerard

Bug 13517: Forums breaking mailing list

Post by David Gerard »

On 03/07/2008, Arthur Squassabia <[email protected]> wrote:
for the oldies that would like it I'll invite you to gmail, so far it has
worked wonderfully in grouping same threaded posts/e-mails together, and as
long as you don't delete current threads/discussion all of the e-mails/posts
will stay linked and because of the ridiculous amounts of storage that gmail
provides (for myself 6.9 GB) deleting email is almost never neccesary.
Seconded. Gmail is an amazingly good client for mailing lists. I
actually read my list mail these days - with Thunderbird it tended to
sit unread for months. I get ~100-200 messages from mailing lists a
day.

The only minus point is that on the Wine list, it sets replies to the
person you're replying to rather than the list. So you need to keep
this in mind.

Even for those wary of letting Google near their personal mail, I
fervently recommend it for handling public list mail.


- d.
Locked