[Police Size]Strange bug in Regedit

Open forum for end-user questions about Wine. Before asking questions, check out the Wiki as a first step.
Forum Rules
Locked
Berillions
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 230
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:55 pm

[Police Size]Strange bug in Regedit

Post by Berillions »

Hi,

I compiled and built Wine source with 64Bits options enabled. But, I have a strange bug when i launch Regedit. I have two prefix, one 64Bits and the second 32Bits.

Regedit with problem :
http://hpics.li/ee2ebf1

Regedit without problem :
http://hpics.li/7aa2e95

How to fix this problem ?
Thanks,
User avatar
dimesio
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 13367
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:30 pm

Re: [Police Size]Strange bug in Regedit

Post by dimesio »

Berillions wrote: I compiled and built Wine source with 64Bits options enabled. But, I have a strange bug when i launch Regedit. I have two prefix, one 64Bits and the second 32Bits.
Are you saying that launching regedit somehow created two separate wineprefixes?
Regedit with problem :
http://hpics.li/ee2ebf1

Regedit without problem :
http://hpics.li/7aa2e95
All I see is that the one "with problem" has a StrictDrawOrdering key and the other doesn't.

Please explain the problem more clearly.
Berillions
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 230
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:55 pm

Post by Berillions »

The first pictures is Regedit when i launch it in the 32bits prefix and the second is Regedit in 64bits Prefix. I launch 2 regedit command, one in every prefix.

If you see the first picture (with one problem), you can notice that the police size for "Registre" "Edition" "Affichage" "Favoris" "Aide" is biggest than the second pictures. This is my problem.
User avatar
dimesio
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 13367
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:30 pm

Post by dimesio »

Berillions wrote:If you see the first picture (with one problem), you can notice that the police size for "Registre" "Edition" "Affichage" "Favoris" "Aide" is biggest than the second pictures. This is my problem.
Ah, I see--you mean the font size. (I've never seen it called "police"; translator issue?)

If this is 1.5.6, it's probably related to http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30869, which is already fixed in git.
Berillions
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 230
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:55 pm

Post by Berillions »

dimesio wrote:
Berillions wrote: (I've never seen it called "police"; translator issue?)
Thanks, i'll try wine-git. And sorry for "police", i forgot to translate this word in English...
"Police" is the French translation for "Fonts" :)
Berillions
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 230
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:55 pm

Post by Berillions »

Hummm... I tried with the latest wine-git and the problem still exist...
Don't understand where come from the problem...
User avatar
dimesio
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 13367
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:30 pm

Post by dimesio »

Berillions wrote:Hummm... I tried with the latest wine-git and the problem still exist...
Don't understand where come from the problem...
Are you sure you didn't inadvertently change the screen resolution in winecfg? Did you install any themes to that wineprefix? If you create a new wineprefix, does it also have the problem?
Berillions
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 230
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:55 pm

Post by Berillions »

1- No, the screen resolution is always 96 ppp in winecfg. I never change this value.
2- No, i never installed themes for wineprefix.
3- No, when a new prefix is create, there isn't this problem. It's randomly because actually in my 64 Bits prefix, i have this problem now and i installed nothing this afternoon...
User avatar
dimesio
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 13367
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:30 pm

Post by dimesio »

Berillions wrote: 3- No, when a new prefix is create, there isn't this problem. It's randomly because actually in my 64 Bits prefix, i have this problem now and i installed nothing this afternoon...
Maybe you should run a virus scan on your wineprefixes? That's all I can think of.
Berillions
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 230
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:55 pm

Post by Berillions »

Humm... It seems that this problem appears only when i use a prefix (32Bits or 64Bits) create by Wine 64Bits.

I built wine 32 bits and re-install all applications and actually, i haven't this bug.
User avatar
dimesio
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 13367
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:30 pm

Post by dimesio »

Berillions wrote:Humm... It seems that this problem appears only when i use a prefix (32Bits or 64Bits) create by Wine 64Bits.

I built wine 32 bits and re-install all applications and actually, i haven't this bug.
Sounds like something is wrong with your 64 bit build. Were there any warnings from configure about anything not found?
Berillions
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 230
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:55 pm

Post by Berillions »

When i build Wine 64Bits or only Wine 32Bits, i have always the same message at the end :

Code: Select all

configure: OpenCL development files not found, OpenCL won't be supported.
configure: gstreamer-0.10 base plugins development files not found, gstreamer support disabled
configure: OSS sound system found but too old (OSSv4 needed), OSS won't be supported.
configure: libgsm development files not found, gsm 06.10 codec won't be supported.
User avatar
dimesio
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 13367
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:30 pm

Post by dimesio »

None of those things should affect fonts.

Does installing corefonts into the affected wineprefixes make any difference?
Locked