Debian....0.9.61.... and crooked hands

A.Stahl · Post by **A.Stahl** » Thu May 08, 2008 5:26 am

Because from times of 0.9.58 version nobody makes packages for Debian, I decided to compile 61st ver myself...
Compiling passed smoothly.
But there are no Russian fonts.
In place of the Russian letters there are rectangles.

Amount of startable programs diminished notedly...
Can you explain how to manage with fonts....
What libraries are needed for complete wine compilation?...
And why do nobody assebling packages for Debian?

P.S.Sorry for my English..... I hope it is understandable.....

vitamin · Post by **vitamin** » Thu May 08, 2008 8:22 am

A.Stahl wrote:Because from times of 0.9.58 version nobody makes packages for Debian, I decided to compile 61st ver myself...
Compiling passed smoothly.
But there are no Russian fonts.
In place of the Russian letters there are rectangles.

Amount of startable programs diminished notedly...
Can you explain how to manage with fonts....
What libraries are needed for complete wine compilation?...
And why do nobody assebling packages for Debian?

P.S.Sorry for my English..... I hope it is understandable.....

http://wiki.winehq.org/Recommended_Packages

A.Stahl · Post by **A.Stahl** » Thu May 08, 2008 8:27 am

Сomplete answer. Thank you.

Daily_Lama · Post by **Daily_Lama** » Thu May 08, 2008 10:58 am

A.Stahl wrote:Because from times of 0.9.58 version nobody makes packages for Debian, I decided to compile 61st ver myself...

http://packages.debian.org/sid/wine
doesn't look like nobody to me

Jim Hall · Post by **Jim Hall** » Thu May 08, 2008 11:44 am

On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Daily_Lama <[email protected]>
wrote:

A.Stahl wrote:
Because from times of 0.9.58 version nobody makes packages for Debian, I
decided to compile 61st ver myself...

http://packages.debian.org/sid/wine
doesn't look like nobody to me

Will this pkg work with Etch?

Jim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-us ... chment.htm

Jonan · Post by **Jonan** » Thu May 08, 2008 4:32 pm

couldn't you copy that package to the wine repository so be can upgrade more comfortably?

vitamin · Post by **vitamin** » Thu May 08, 2008 4:35 pm

Jonan wrote:couldn't you copy that package to the wine repository so be can upgrade more comfortably?

In case you did not noticed that _is_ official Debian repository.

Jonan · Post by **Jonan** » Thu May 08, 2008 4:42 pm

vitamin wrote:In case you did not noticed that _is_ official Debian repository.

That is debian _sid_ official repository. If I add it to my sources.list I'll have to set priorities for aptitude not no upgrade my hole system to an extremely unstable distro.

I think it's much easer to copy it to wine's repository, but it's just my opinion.

vitamin · Post by **vitamin** » Thu May 08, 2008 4:45 pm

Jonan wrote:I think it's much easer to copy it to wine's repository

Which one is it? Wine does not have it's repository for binaries. Only source. Everything else is external maintained by different people.

Jonan · Post by **Jonan** » Thu May 08, 2008 4:47 pm

vitamin wrote:Which one is it? Wine does not have it's repository for binaries. Only source. Everything else is external maintained by different people.

I mean the one hosted at budgetdedicated.com that was used to be maintained by Scott Ritchie.

http://www.winehq.org/site/download-deb

vitamin · Post by **vitamin** » Thu May 08, 2008 7:00 pm

Jonan wrote:
vitamin wrote:Which one is it? Wine does not have it's repository for binaries. Only source. Everything else is external maintained by different people.
I mean the one hosted at budgetdedicated.com that was used to be maintained by Scott Ritchie.

http://www.winehq.org/site/download-deb

Read above. It is not an "official" Wine binary repository. It's the repository maintained by Scott. For any questions with it contact him directly.

Hellmark · Post by **Hellmark** » Thu May 08, 2008 8:48 pm

From: "Jonan" <[email protected]>

vitamin wrote:
In case you did not noticed that _is_ official Debian repository.
That is debian _sid_ official repository. If I add it to my
sources.list I'll have to set priorities for aptitude not no upgrade my
hole system to an extremely unstable distro.
I think it's much easer to copy it to wine's repository, but it's just my opinion.

Uhm, as someone who's used sid for years, it isn't unstable, let alone
extremely so. I've experienced just as many problems with my Stable and
Testing machines as I have on the ones running Sid.

Ove Kaaven · Post by **Ove Kaaven** » Thu May 08, 2008 10:37 pm

Fine, I've rebuilt the official Debian 0.9.61-2 packages on etch.

I put them up at http://people.debian.org/~ovek/wine/, you can apt-get
them by putting this into sources.list:

deb http://people.debian.org/~ovek/wine/ ./

I might not always build these in the future, though.

vitamin · Post by **vitamin** » Thu May 08, 2008 11:52 pm

Ove Kaaven wrote:Fine, I've rebuilt the official Debian 0.9.61-2 packages on etch.

I put them up at http://people.debian.org/~ovek/wine/, you can apt-get
them by putting this into sources.list:

deb http://people.debian.org/~ovek/wine/ ./

I might not always build these in the future, though.

Thank you.