Bugzilla comment
Bugzilla comment
too many UNCO bugs are listed for wine < 1.0 . I suggest purging or archiving the really old ones since they must have been fixed or no-one cares for them atm. Either way they're too confusing!
Re: Bugzilla comment
They are slowly being closed as abandoned if no one replies for over 6 months with the current status.stimpak wrote:too many UNCO bugs are listed for wine < 1.0 . I suggest purging or archiving the really old ones since they must have been fixed or no-one cares for them atm. Either way they're too confusing!
Bugzilla comment
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:01 AM, stimpak <[email protected]> wrote:
verify they still exist, and closing non responsive ones.
I put in a request for volunteers last week. If you've got
time/bandwith to spare, you can help by testing these old bugs:
http://forum.winehq.org/viewtopic.php?t=2565
In short:
Upgrade to git/wine 1.1.6.
Look at these bugs:
http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?quer ... e0-0-0=180
Test in a clean WINEPREFIX.
Leave a note in the bug about it. Fixed/still present/blocked by other
bug/busted download link/etc.
--
-Austin
Many of them are still valid. I am going through inactive ones totoo many UNCO bugs are listed for wine < 1.0 . I suggest purging or archiving the really old ones since they must have been fixed or no-one cares for them atm. Either way they're too confusing!
verify they still exist, and closing non responsive ones.
I put in a request for volunteers last week. If you've got
time/bandwith to spare, you can help by testing these old bugs:
http://forum.winehq.org/viewtopic.php?t=2565
In short:
Upgrade to git/wine 1.1.6.
Look at these bugs:
http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?quer ... e0-0-0=180
Test in a clean WINEPREFIX.
Leave a note in the bug about it. Fixed/still present/blocked by other
bug/busted download link/etc.
--
-Austin
Bugzilla comment
Austin English <[email protected]> at Oct 21, 2008 8:16 AM wrote about Re: [Wine] Bugzilla comment
Would you also like confirmation/denial on Darwine or would you rather these be confirmed only on Linux?
James McKenzie
Austin:On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:01 AM, stimpak <[email protected]> wrote:Many of them are still valid. I am going through inactive ones totoo many UNCO bugs are listed for wine < 1.0 . I suggest purging or archiving the really old ones since they must have been fixed or no-one cares for them atm. Either way they're too confusing!
verify they still exist, and closing non responsive ones.
I put in a request for volunteers last week. If you've got
time/bandwith to spare, you can help by testing these old bugs:
http://forum.winehq.org/viewtopic.php?t=2565
In short:
Upgrade to git/wine 1.1.6.
Look at these bugs:
http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?quer ... e0-0-0=180
Test in a clean WINEPREFIX.
Leave a note in the bug about it. Fixed/still present/blocked by other
bug/busted download link/etc.
Would you also like confirmation/denial on Darwine or would you rather these be confirmed only on Linux?
James McKenzie