Yona-TYT I have some bad ish news.
Appdb and bug report entries are the responsibilities of the users of the applications.
Someone else could report this?
So most likely no one else will report this. In fact people like me who have done IRC support and other support for wine know that doing a bug or appdb report for someone else when you don't use the application is forbid. Why is it forbid developer may need to ask a real user if the bug fix they have done fixed it or not. So unless you do it don't expect us to. We will provide advice and suggestions but key tasks like adding entries to Appdb to log what versions work and fail as well as bug reports we cannot do for you.
In fact asking some else to report for you who you are not paying is impolite. Asking for advice how to write the report we can give you that.
If you cannot do a regression test you should add Appdb Test Results that X versions of wine is failed so someone else using the same program who also cannot do a regression test with a different version can also add working and failed. Appdb Test Results exists so multi people can build up the section of the information of a regression test. So reducing the size of the regression test the developer has to perform attempting to fix a bug. Developer time is highly limited. So its a little early to ask us to do stuff you have not done everything you can yet.
Of course developers would prefer if you could do a regression test. Do at least have a look at the process of performing a regression test.
http://wiki.winehq.org/RegressionTesting Yes the process is detailed here. We are willing to accept users saying Regression Tests are too hard and above their skill set. Do be aware not doing a regression test will extend the amount of time until a fix appears. Why regression tested bugs developers will deal with quicker because they take less time and resources. There is a price to pay by choosing not to do a regression test process.
If you are after issue fixed reasonably quickly you will find someone to pay to do regression test for you or work out how to do regression test yourself. Yes it is possible to pay codeweavers and the like to do the regression test for you and of course money talks. So a choice between paid and unpaid regression test you can bet what one the developers will be doing. Not doing it yourself or paying you are going to be at back of que. As long as you are willing to accept that we have no problems. Developers have to eat so paying people do come first on major-ally time consuming tasks. Regression testing is very heavy on the time consuming.
Yona-TYT you can now see why the advice was do regression test.
I guess you did not record exactly what version of wine 1.7 you first had. Because at this point you should have two appdb entries todo. Yes linking bugs to appdb entries also allows developers to see you are interested.
So far I have not see a wine log.
http://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ#get_log Application error messages tell us almost nothing useful. With a log one of us here in support might see something that we can suggest that might get the application working. We will not see anything from Application error messages.
Yona-TYT you have just learnt why you should keep a record of what versions of wine the applications are working with.
By the way Wine 1.6 cannot be what you are running it had to be wine 1.6.2 because the program did not run with Wine 1.6. Please always use wine --version not package names. Yes this could be that a patch to 1.6 line has never been applied to the 1.7.x line.
One of the big problems that new people to FOSS have they complain about something in a forum and a mailing list then come back years latter and its not fixed. Why is it not fixed it was never put into reporting system because the person with the problem is the one todo that.
Yona-TYT please don't take me as mean. But over these things I believe in be blunt now it solves a lot of problems in the future once you understand how the process here works and how the process in most FOSS projects work.