starcraft and battle.net don't render properly.
starcraft and battle.net don't render properly.
For some reason, battle.net's app only shows a blue square and nothing else. Starcraft shows nothing but blackness.
Any ideas what could be behind this?
Using wine-staging 4.6. My os is a linux distrobution.
It is arch based, but uses debian packages and is a hybrid kind of. So ignore that part.
Wine-staging 4.5 had no issues for me, but wine-staging 4.6 has this issue as odd as that sounds.
I compiled it from source using this website/the github guides and then applied it to my os...
And again, wine-staging 4.6 has the issues not 4.5 wine-staging...
Any ideas what could be behind this?
Using wine-staging 4.6. My os is a linux distrobution.
It is arch based, but uses debian packages and is a hybrid kind of. So ignore that part.
Wine-staging 4.5 had no issues for me, but wine-staging 4.6 has this issue as odd as that sounds.
I compiled it from source using this website/the github guides and then applied it to my os...
And again, wine-staging 4.6 has the issues not 4.5 wine-staging...
Re: starcraft and battle.net don't render properly.
I don't have the same issue with Wine-Staging-4.6 and Battle.net, but was it not a "mono" update (.net implementation thingy) for 4.6?
Perhaps some mono update gone wrong? (Cos i really think the Battle.net app needs a working Mono).
From the patchlist for 4.6.mscoree: Update Wine Mono to 4.8.1.
mscoree: Check for mono runtime path in registry
Perhaps some mono update gone wrong? (Cos i really think the Battle.net app needs a working Mono).
Re: starcraft and battle.net don't render properly.
Okay, how does one install wine mono from source?Cybermax wrote:I don't have the same issue with Wine-Staging-4.6 and Battle.net, but was it not a "mono" update (.net implementation thingy) for 4.6?
From the patchlist for 4.6.mscoree: Update Wine Mono to 4.8.1.
mscoree: Check for mono runtime path in registry
Perhaps some mono update gone wrong? (Cos i really think the Battle.net app needs a working Mono).
Re: starcraft and battle.net don't render properly.
Hm... it appears I have found the solution: wine-staging + corefonts from winetricks. and now it works alot better.
Mark solved I will if I can.
Mark solved I will if I can.
Re: starcraft and battle.net don't render properly.
You can't - due to forum spam bots...zapper wrote:Mark solved I will if I can.
You also only get a 10-30 (?) minute editing window for forum posts...
Bob
Re: starcraft and battle.net don't render properly.
Well, that's a shame, meh... 4.7 wine-staging works fine though.Bob Wya wrote:You can't - due to forum spam bots...zapper wrote:Mark solved I will if I can.
You also only get a 10-30 (?) minute editing window for forum posts...
Bob
corefonts helps a lot.
Re: starcraft and battle.net don't render properly.
Huh? Wine-staging-4.7 works fine with Battle.net? Self compiled, or from winehq.org?zapper wrote:Well, that's a shame, meh... 4.7 wine-staging works fine though.Bob Wya wrote:You can't - due to forum spam bots...zapper wrote:Mark solved I will if I can.
You also only get a 10-30 (?) minute editing window for forum posts...
Bob
corefonts helps a lot.
Cos wine-staging-4.7 "release" is broken without https://github.com/wine-staging/wine-st ... bacd9cc36f for battle.net for a few ppl.
Re: starcraft and battle.net don't render properly.
corefonts helps a lot.[/quote]
Huh? Wine-staging-4.7 works fine with Battle.net? Self compiled, or from winehq.org?
Cos wine-staging-4.7 "release" is broken without https://github.com/wine-staging/wine-st ... bacd9cc36f for battle.net for a few ppl.[/quote]
Wine-devel + wine-staging via the github page. And yes, 4.6 broke for me, but when I compiled wine 4.7-staging, it worked well.
https://github.com/wine-staging/wine-staging + winehq's 4.7 devel and winetricks + corefonts. I use a distro called Hyperbola so I had to use sources, its not a rolling release distro but it is, Based on ARCH but with debian packages for stability and security. Hyperbola.info is the website.
Huh? Wine-staging-4.7 works fine with Battle.net? Self compiled, or from winehq.org?
Cos wine-staging-4.7 "release" is broken without https://github.com/wine-staging/wine-st ... bacd9cc36f for battle.net for a few ppl.[/quote]
Wine-devel + wine-staging via the github page. And yes, 4.6 broke for me, but when I compiled wine 4.7-staging, it worked well.
https://github.com/wine-staging/wine-staging + winehq's 4.7 devel and winetricks + corefonts. I use a distro called Hyperbola so I had to use sources, its not a rolling release distro but it is, Based on ARCH but with debian packages for stability and security. Hyperbola.info is the website.
Re: starcraft and battle.net don't render properly.
Surely that'll only be an issue if the end-user chooses to enable eventfd_synchronization (aka wine-esync) with:Cybermax wrote:...
Huh? Wine-staging-4.7 works fine with Battle.net? Self compiled, or from winehq.org?
Cos wine-staging-4.7 "release" is broken without https://github.com/wine-staging/wine-st ... bacd9cc36f for battle.net for a few ppl.
Code: Select all
export WINEESYNC=1
Bob
Re: starcraft and battle.net don't render properly.
Aaah.. Its default OFF.. dohBob Wya wrote: This is not the default behaviour however...
Bob
Hehe.. guess a lot of ppl actually have no clue its even there, cos its not really "documented" that well for those that dont know/have never used.
Sveinar
Re: starcraft and battle.net don't render properly.
I've spent hours f****ing about rebasing the damn patchset for my Gentoo Wine ebuilds (do we really need 84 patches!)Cybermax wrote: Aaah.. Its default OFF.. doh
Hehe.. guess a lot of ppl actually have no clue its even there, cos its not really "documented" that well for those that dont know/have never used.
Sveinar
So it's not entirely by choice that I'm somewhat familiar with it...
In fact I'm still rebasing wine-esync for vanilla Wine. Dealing with additional breakages every week or so...
If I wasn't such a stickler for ensuring the rebased patches apply without fuzzing...
Bob
Re: starcraft and battle.net don't render properly.
Where is the thumbs up smily thing?Bob Wya wrote: If I wasn't such a stickler for ensuring the rebased patches apply without fuzzing...
Bob